The Franchise Owner's most trusted news source

Log In / Register | Mar 18, 2018

Comments regarding this article:


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Don Sniegowski's picture

Franchisors not required to disclose case dismissals

The FDD’s requirement of Item 3 disclosure in the Franchise Rule. It says:

For purposes of this disclosure, a party is “held liable” if that party must pay money or other consideration, must reduce an indebtedness by the amount of an award, cannot enforce its rights, or must take action adverse to its interests. Accordingly, dismissals, including a dismissal concluding an adversarial proceeding, need not be disclosed.

Since the franchisees lost and their case was dismissed, it seems Culver’s is not required to reveal it — even though, frankly, buyers would want to know. 

Post new comment

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.